Ohio Court of Appeals· 9/22/2022

State v. Acosta

Citations

2022 Ohio 3327

Syllabus

Motion to withdraw plea Crim.R. 32.1 postsentence abuse of discretion manifest injustice in the plea proceeding newly discovered evidence recantation actual innocence. Because appellant failed to demonstrate manifest injustice in the plea proceeding, the trial court erred in granting his motion to withdraw guilty plea.

Judges: Celebrezze

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Mills
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-10· cited 3×
State v. Davis
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-03
State v. Casshie
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-08
Davis v. 40 East, L.L.C.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-15
In re C.V.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-01-26

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Blakemore v. Blakemore
Ohio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
State v. Adams
Ohio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
State v. Smith
Ohio Supreme Court· 1977-03-23· cited 1,253×
Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
State v. Griggs
Ohio Supreme Court· 2004-09-08· cited 395×
State v. Stumpf
Ohio Supreme Court· 1987-08-19· cited 305×
State ex rel. Schneider v. Kreiner
Ohio Supreme Court· 1998-09-23· cited 244×
State v. Montgomery
Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-06-30· cited 42×
State v. Minifee
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-07-18· cited 38×
State v. Bloom
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-08-23· cited 27×
State v. Simmons
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-13· cited 8×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.