Ohio Court of Appeals· 1/26/2023
In re C.V.
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 223
Syllabus
Abuse of discretion permanent custody clear and convincing evidence motion for a continuance. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that clear and convincing evidence support granting permanent custody of the appellant's children to CCDCFS. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant's motion for a continuance.
Judges: Laster Mays
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- Davis v. FlickingerOhio Supreme Court· 1997-02-12· cited 1,567×
- State v. UngerOhio Supreme Court· 1981-07-01· cited 1,145×
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- In re HayesOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-18· cited 613×
- In re CunninghamOhio Supreme Court· 1979-07-18· cited 599×
- In re HoffmanOhio Supreme Court· 2002-10-23· cited 194×
- In re J.F.Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County· 2018-01-11· cited 48×
- In re Y.V.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-05-19· cited 17×
- In re J.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-04-26· cited 10×
- In re C.G.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-12-19· cited 10×
- State v. ParkerOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-02-10· cited 9×
- State v. AcostaOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-22· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.