State v. Ackerman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Cases allowing sentencing errors to be reviewed as fundamental error involve defendants’ challenges to their sentences, not the state’s.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Calvert
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-08-12· cited 16×
• Shenfeld v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-05-20· cited 12×
• Phillips v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-06· cited 6×
• State v. Bryant S. Rivera
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-07-02· cited 1×
• STATE OF FLORIDA v. NELSON ERVIN
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-03-18
• State v. Acevedo
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-06-23

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Poore v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-09-22· cited 288×
• Maddox v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-05-11· cited 262×
• Scates v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-07-23· cited 54×
• State v. Henriquez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-09· cited 20×
• State v. Stafford
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-20· cited 4×
• Doumar v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-05-20· cited 2×
• State v. Baccari
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-07· cited 2×