Phillips v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Harrison and concluding that, because the charge of attempted robbery in that case was satisfied when the defendant placed the victim in fear, the crime of battery had not been subsumed
• “We conclude the state attorney can choose to request the removal of a PRR designation on a defendant, when the defendant, in a 3.800(b) motion to correct his sentence, points out that he cannot receive both the enhancement of PRR punishment and consecutive sentences.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dunbar v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-04· cited 5×
• T.C.E. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-21· cited 3×
• Stark v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-02-10· cited 1×
• TCE v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-21
• CHRISTOPHER TAVARIS DEAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-04-08
• ISAIAH D. KELLY v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-09-14

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Cotton
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-06-15· cited 311×
• Hamrick v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-01-04· cited 24×
• State v. Ackerman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-23· cited 7×
• Maultsby v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-03-05· cited 5×
• Harrison v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-04-28· cited 2×