Supreme Court of New Jersey· 9/10/1993
State v. Acker
Citations
- 634 A.2d 522
- 134 N.J. 485
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that prosecutors are not permitted to characterize defense attorney and defense as “outrageous, remarkable, absolutely preposterous and absolutely outrageous”
- holding prosecutor's summation in which he called defendants \animals\ and \brutes\ reversible error where such statements were not part of any testimony
- condemning a warning by the prosecutor to the jury about not doing its job
- written policy allowing outside carriers to bid on bus routes not an exempted intra-agency statement but a rule establishing policy applicable to an industry
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. FrostSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1999-04-15· cited 360×
- State v. TimmendequasSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1999-08-11· cited 325×
- State v. MortonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1998-07-30· cited 222×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2001-05-08· cited 192×
- State v. ScherzerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-05-20· cited 164×
- State v. TuckerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1994-06-22· cited 130×
- State v. RoachSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1996-08-07· cited 127×
- State v. McGuireNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2011-03-16· cited 120×
- State v. AtwaterNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2008-05-21· cited 47×
- State v. RodriguezNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2003-12-29· cited 28×
- State v. GoodeNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1994-12-15· cited 28×
- State v. NealNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2003-06-16· cited 22×
- State v. JenkinsNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-03-21· cited 22×
- State v. TilghmanNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-12-13· cited 21×
- State v. RomanNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2005-12-23· cited 19×
- State v. BuschamNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2003-05-28· cited 19×
- State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-07-11· cited 17×
- State v. MarquezNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1994-11-16· cited 17×
- New Jersey Builders Ass'n v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-12-10· cited 10×
- State v. KellyNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2009-04-06· cited 9×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.