Court of Appeals of Washington· 8/2/1995
State v. Acevedo
Citations
- 899 P.2d 31
- 78 Wash. App. 886
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding appropriations and substantive legislation may be in the same bill so long as one-subject rule satisfied
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bridgewater
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CornejoWashington Supreme Court· 1996-11-07· cited 97×
- In Re BootWashington Supreme Court· 1996-11-07· cited 88×
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-12-21· cited 15×
- Fray v. Spokane CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-02-20· cited 12×
- State v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-11-06· cited 10×
- Elford v. City of Battle GroundCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-08-01· cited 6×
- KNEA v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 2017-01-20
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GrisbyWashington Supreme Court· 1982-08-24· cited 215×
- Matthews v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 172×
- Flanders v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court· 1977-01-07· cited 67×
- State Ex Rel. Toll Bridge Auth. v. YelleWashington Supreme Court· 1962-12-13· cited 49×
- Department of Ecology v. State Finance CommitteeWashington Supreme Court· 1991-01-24· cited 48×
- Service Employees International Union, Local 6 v. Superintendent of Public InstructionWashington Supreme Court· 1985-08-29· cited 43×
- State Ex Rel. Wash. Toll Bridge Auth. v. YelleWashington Supreme Court· 1959-07-31· cited 40×
- Frazier v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 28×
- State v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-03-08· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.