Flanders v. Morris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “in certain instances the legislature must place conditions and limitations on the expenditures of monies”
• discussing a state constitutional provision similar to that of Missouri’s section 28
• appropriations provision defined eligibility for services where it created an age requirement that did not exist in the codified welfare statute
• substantive provision of appropriation bill, which had failed to pass as amendment to substantive law, was unconstitutionally contained in appropriation bill where it conflicted with general law
• change in eligibility for public assistance and supplemental appropriations
• change in eligibility for public assistance and supplemental appropriations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).