State Highway Board v. Pratt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he party who alleges error has the burden of showing that he has been prejudiced thereby. Otherwise it is presumed to be harmless, if it is error at all.”
• “[T]he party who alleges error has the burden of showing that he has been prejudiced thereby. Otherwise it is presumed to be harmless, if it is error at all.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Myott v. Myott
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-04-29· cited 79×
• Green Mountain Marble Co. v. State Highway Board
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1972-10-03· cited 37×
• Bishop v. Town of Barre
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1982-02-02· cited 35×
• Hanson-Metayer v. Hanson-Metayer
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2013-04-12· cited 24×
• State Highway Board v. Jackson
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1969-07-15· cited 8×
• Hislop v. Department of Social Welfare
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1978-06-06· cited 6×
• Smith v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1981-02-03· cited 5×
• State Highway Board v. Jackson
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1971-04-06· cited 4×
• State Highway Board v. Erickson
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1975-04-03· cited 2×
• State Transportation Board v. AIG Realty, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1980-04-08

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Loeb v. Loeb
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1955-05-03· cited 43×
• Latchis v. State Highway Board
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1957-07-07· cited 29×
• Eno v. City of Burlington
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1965-04-06· cited 21×
• State Highway Board v. Coburn
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1966-04-05· cited 10×
• State Highway Board v. Hazen
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1966-07-11· cited 8×
• T. O. Metcalf Co. v. Crossroads, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1959-05-05· cited 8×