Bishop v. Town of Barre

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that \this Court will not search the record for errors inadequately briefed\
• claimant entitled to benefits upon showing that injury was suffered by accident arising out of employment, and need not prove employer’s negligence
• although we generally give deference to decisions of administrative agency, we will not uphold the Commissioner’s interpretation of workers’ compensation regulation that is clearly erroneous
• “[P]ermanent disability benefits are calculated solely on the basis of physical impairment . . . regardless of loss of present earning power.” (quotation omitted)
• “The claimant correctly assigns protection against wage loss as one of the Act’s purposes.”
• “The claimant correctly assigns protection against wage loss as one of the Act’s purposes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).