State Highway Board v. Hazen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that legislature subsequently defined “necessary” giving the term a broader meaning
• pre-petition public hearing is informational for highway board, and is not a judicial trial; thus, defect in notice not fatal where no prejudice demonstrated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re South Burlington-Shelburne Highway Project
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2002-12-12· cited 31×
• In Re the Speed Limit for the Union Pacific Railroad Ex Rel. City of Shakopee
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-07-07· cited 15×
• State Highway Board v. Pratt
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1969-02-04· cited 11×
• Hinesburg Sand & Gravel, Co. v. Chittenden Solid Waste District
  D. Vermont· 1997-04-03· cited 8×
• Auclair v. VERMONT ELECTRIC POWER CO., INC.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1974-07-01· cited 6×
• In Re Chittenden Solid Waste District
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1995-01-20· cited 5×
• State Highway Board v. Erickson
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1975-04-03· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Latchis v. State Highway Board
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1957-07-07· cited 29×
• Savard v. George
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1965-10-05· cited 10×
• State Highway Board v. Coburn
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1966-04-05· cited 10×
• American Oil Company v. State Highway Board
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1962-01-02· cited 10×