Skip to main content

State ex rel. Riley v. Rudloff

Citations

  • 212 W. Va. 767
  • 575 S.E.2d 377
  • 2002 W. Va. LEXIS 235

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Although this case was brought as a petition for writ of mandamus, we have concluded that this matter should be treated as a writ of prohibition.”
  • “Upon further consideration of the issues herein raised, however, we choose (as we have done in many appropriate cases) to treat this matter as a writ of prohibition.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, File, Reserves, Right, Starcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.