Skip to main content
· 2/24/1970

Crockett v. Andrews

Citations

  • 172 S.E.2d 384
  • 153 W. Va. 714
  • 1970 W. Va. LEXIS 239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[wjhere language of a statute is free from ambiguity, its plain meaning is to be accepted and applied without resort to interpretation”
  • “Where the language of a statute is free from ambiguity, its plain meaning is to be accepted and applied without resort to interpretation.”
  • “Where the language of a statute is free from ambiguity, its plain meaning is to be accepted and applied without resort to interpretation.”
  • “Where the language of a statute is free from ambiguity, its plain meaning is to be accepted and applied without resort to interpretation.”
  • “Where the language of a statute is free from ambiguity, its plain meaning is to be accepted and applied without resort to interpretation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Caplan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.