· 2/24/1970
Crockett v. Andrews
Citations
- 172 S.E.2d 384
- 153 W. Va. 714
- 1970 W. Va. LEXIS 239
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[wjhere language of a statute is free from ambiguity, its plain meaning is to be accepted and applied without resort to interpretation”
- “Where the language of a statute is free from ambiguity, its plain meaning is to be accepted and applied without resort to interpretation.”
- “Where the language of a statute is free from ambiguity, its plain meaning is to be accepted and applied without resort to interpretation.”
- “Where the language of a statute is free from ambiguity, its plain meaning is to be accepted and applied without resort to interpretation.”
- “Where the language of a statute is free from ambiguity, its plain meaning is to be accepted and applied without resort to interpretation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Caplan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.