George Hamm v. Dekalb County, and Pat Jarvis, Sheriff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that inmate’s desire for some other form of medical treatment does not constitute deliberate indifference violative of the Constitution
• holding that the mere fact an inmate desires a different mode of medical treatment does not amount to deliberate indifference violative of the Constitution
• holding that the mere fact an inmate desires a different mode of medical treatment does not amount to deliberate indifference violative of the Constitution
• holding that mere fact inmate desires a different mode of treatment does not amount to deliberate indifference violative of the Constitution
• holding that mere fact an inmate desires a different mode of medical treatment does not amount to deliberate indifference violative of the Constitution
• holding that the mere fact an inmate desires a different mode of medical treatment does not amount to deliberate indifference violative of the Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).