State Ex Rel. Nixon v. McClure

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A majority of courts considering the issue hold that the protection afforded by § 8346(a) continues to apply to the funds even after they are in possession of the payee.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Anthis v. Copland
  Washington Supreme Court· 2012-02-16· cited 37×
• Bertha Tom v. First American Credit Union
  First Circuit· 1998-08-10· cited 26×
• Hundley v. Wenzel
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2001-10-30· cited 16×
• Lewis v. Department of Social Services
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2001-10-30· cited 10×
• State Ex Rel. Estate of Perry v. Roper
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2005-05-24· cited 9×
• J.P. v. Missouri State Family Support Division
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2010-04-20· cited 7×
• State ex rel. Nixon v. Mahmud
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-12-07· cited 3×
• Taylor v. Ferguson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2014-05-20· cited 1×
• Tom v. First American
  Tenth Circuit· 1998-08-10
• Unnamed case
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2014-05-20
• State of Missouri v. Arizona Hall, Jr.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2015-09-08