State ex rel. Nixon v. Mahmud

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument “that it is the origin of the funds that make them exempt” under the Missouri right-to-receive statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State Ex Rel. Nixon v. Overmyer
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-05-02· cited 8×
• State of Missouri, ex rel, Chris Koster, Attorney General v. Mark Bailey
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2016-05-24· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1993-04-20· cited 2,373×
• American Healthcare Management, Inc. v. Director of Revenue
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1999-02-09· cited 47×
• Reeves v. Keesler
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1996-01-30· cited 29×
• Hatfield v. Cristopher
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1992-10-27· cited 22×
• State Ex Rel. Nixon v. McClure
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1998-05-26· cited 13×
• Badgley v. Missouri Department of Corrections
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1998-08-04· cited 8×