Skip to main content
· 3/28/2014

State Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Miller

Citations

  • 234 Ariz. 289
  • 321 P.3d 454
  • 683 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 49
  • 2014 WL 1281865
  • 2014 Ariz. App. LEXIS 50

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The assessment of the sufficiency of the facts and data is a quantitative, not qualitative analysis.”
  • \An appellate court 'will not disturb a trial court's rulings on the admission . . . of evidence unless [the court] finds a clear abuse of discretion and resulting prejudice.'\ (quoting Lohmeier v. Hammer, 214 Ariz. 57, 61, ¶ 7 (App. 2006))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gould

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.