Anthony Tyus v. Urban Search Management

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that evidence of defendant's knowledge of Fair Housing Act and intentional disregard of the Act raised jury question on punitive damages issue
• reversing judgment as a matter of law in favor of defendant on punitive damages in a Fair Housing Act case because plaintiffs presented evidence that defendants had knowledge of the law and engaged in intentional acts of housing discrimination
• instruction \confusing\ where jury charged that one element of a Fair Housing Act violation is proof that the discriminatory housing practice caused \actual injury\
• “the district court must ensure that it is dealing with an expert, not just a hired gun”
• “We have noted a number of times since the Supreme Court decided Daubert that its framework for assessing expert testimony is applicable to social science experts, just as it applies to experts in the hard sciences.” (collecting cases)
• “We have noted a number of times since the Supreme Court decided Daubert that its framework for assessing expert testimony is applicable to social science experts, just as it applies to experts in the hard sciences.” (collecting cases)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).