Skip to main content

State Ex Rel. Lockert v. Crowell

Citations

  • 631 S.W.2d 702
  • 1982 Tenn. LEXIS 398

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that there are “excellent policy reasons for the presence of a provision that counties must be represented in the Senate”
  • tracking the sizes of Tennessee’s House and Senate throughout Tennessee history
  • “[T]he plan adopted must cross as few county lines as is necessary to comply with the federal constitutional requirements.”
  • standing of voters in affected districts “not in issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Drowota, Harbison, Cooper, Fones, Brock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State Ex Rel. Lockert v. Crowell

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.