Clements v. Valles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• regarding the 9.9% deviation in a Texas reapportionment plan approved in White v Regester, 412 US 755; 93 S Ct 2332; 37 L Ed 2d 314 [1973], as the limit
• regarding the 9.9% deviation in a Texas reapportionment plan approved in White v Regester, 412 US 755; 93 S Ct 2332; 37 L Ed 2d 314 [1973], as the limit
• “appellees presented evidence of a number of alternate redistricting plans which maintain more of the surplus populations within county lines” without violating federal requirements
• plaintiffs sought a declaration of the unconstitutionality of a reapportionment bill and an injunction restraining the Governor, Attorney General, and Secretary of State from conducting elections pursuant to the bill

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).