Skip to main content

State ex rel. Casey v. Indus. Comm.

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 532

Syllabus

The SHO's mistaken reference to a prior commission order being upheld by this court was harmless error. As relator failed to present evidence of new and changed circumstances, the commission properly found relator's third motion for loss of use of the left leg barred by res judicata. Objections overruled magistrate's decision adopted writ of mandamus denied.

Judges: Dorrian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.