State ex rel. Parrish v. Walter Randolph & Carl Fritschi
Citations
- 239 N.E.3d 1023
- 2024 Ohio 1135
Syllabus
The magistrate did not err in concluding R.C. 4123.58(G) is not unconstitutionally retroactive, and the commission did not abuse its discretion in determining relator failed to present evidence of new and changed circumstances to permit the commission to hear the merits of relator's third application for permanent total disability compensation. Writ of mandamus denied.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \It is the general rule that issues raised for the first time at the appellate level will not be reviewed.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Luper Schuster, J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.