Skip to main content
· 6/28/2024

State ex rel. Diamond v. Indus. Comm.

Citations

  • 247 N.E.3d 540
  • 2024 Ohio 2499

Syllabus

We adopt the magistrate's findings of fact and revise some conclusions of law. The evidence showed the amputation of relator's left middle finger severed some of his proximal phalanx, and R.C. 4123.57(B) thus required the commission to award relator the total loss of that finger. The commission's finding that relator lost no more than two-thirds of his left index finger, however, was supported by some evidence in the record. The requested writ of mandamus is granted in part and denied in part.

Judges: Leland, J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.