Skip to main content
· 10/28/2010

State Ex Rel. AT & T Mobility, LLC v. Wilson

Citations

  • 703 S.E.2d 543
  • 226 W. Va. 572
  • 2010 W. Va. LEXIS 114

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[E]very case in which the issue of an unconscionable adhesion contract is raised must be examined on the basis of the language of that particular contract in conjunction with the specific facts surrounding the dispute.”
  • arbitration agreement’s ban on class actions does not render it substantively unconscionable
  • “[E]very case in which the issue of an unconscionable adhesion contract is raised must be 11 examined on the basis of the language of that particular contract in conjunction with the specific facts surrounding the dispute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.