Nettles v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a verdict was legally inconsistent where the jury convicted defendant of the charges of carjacking with a firearm and robbery with a firearm but also made a special finding that the defendant did not possess a firearm
• holding that a verdict was legally inconsistent where the jury convicted defendant of the charges of carjacking with a firearm and robbery with a firearm but also made a special finding that the defendant did not possess a firearm
• “A verdict which is factually inconsistent is permissible in Florida as it results from a jury’s inherent authority to acquit.”
• “A verdict which is factually inconsistent is permissible in Florida as it results from a jury’s inherent authority to acquit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Starling v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-12-23· cited 6×
• Darryl L. Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-07-15· cited 1×
• Darryl L. Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-07-11
• David Lai v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-11-15
• David Lai v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-11-19

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Shavers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-05-02· cited 7×
• State v. Cappalo
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-10· cited 5×