Rubin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statute of limitations vests a substantive right, so statute of limitations in effect at time of incident is controlling
• statute of limitations vests a substantive right, so statute of limitations in effect at time of incident is controlling
• \[S]ubsequently-filed informations `will not be subject to the statute of limitations when they are shown to be connected with and in continuation of a prosecution timely begun.'\
• “[S]ubsequently-filed informations ‘will not be subject to the statute of limitations when they are shown to be connected with and in continuation of a prosecution timely begun.’ ”
• “A subsequently filed information, which contains language indicating that it is a continuation of the same prosecution, timely commenced will not be considered an abandonment of the first information and therefore will not be barred by the statute of limitations.”
• upholding amendment correcting the name of the corporate victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Commonwealth v. Bargeron
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1988-06-14· cited 59×
• Gallardo v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1989-03-29· cited 26×
• State v. Clifton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-18· cited 25×
• Geiger v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-10-26· cited 24×
• State v. Garofalo
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-08-08· cited 24×
• M.F. v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-07-11· cited 21×
• State v. T.A.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-07-22· cited 20×
• Higgins v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1994-01-10· cited 13×
• Perez v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-06-29· cited 13×
• State v. Creekpaum
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1987-02-13· cited 10×
• Scharfschwerdt v. Kanarek
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-11-08· cited 10×
• State v. In the Interest of D.I.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-08-21· cited 8×
• L.G.R. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-03-11· cited 8×
• LaMorte v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-05-02· cited 7×
• State v. M.M.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-02-23· cited 6×
• El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Candelario Ayala
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 2003-11-08· cited 6×
• Cheffer v. JUDGE, DIV.S', 15TH JUD. CIRCUIT
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-02-24· cited 5×
• Labrador v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-15· cited 5×
• Starling v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-11-16· cited 5×
• Fridovich v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-04-26· cited 5×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Reino v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1977-10-27· cited 102×
• State Ex Rel. Manucy v. Wadsworth
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1974-04-01· cited 43×
• Mead v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1958-03-21· cited 35×
• State v. Adjmi
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-12-29· cited 20×
• State v. Emanuel
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-05-31· cited 16×
• Rubin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-02-13· cited 8×
• Di Stefano v. Langston
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1973-03-07· cited 5×
• Lane v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1976-09-23· cited 5×
• State ex rel. Florida Petroleum Marketers Ass'n v. McClure
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-04-15· cited 4×
• State ex rel. Ridenour v. Bryson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-01-30· cited 3×