Tenth Circuit· 6/29/2009

Starkey Ex Rel. AB v. BOULDER COUNTY SOC. SERV.

Citations

569 F.3d 1244

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that “we may affirm the ruling” when an appellant fails to “challenge a district court’s alternate ground for its ruling”
declining to consider a jurisdictional question where the party claiming jurisdiction would clearly lose on the merits
explaining that refusal to consider arguments or evidence supporting an argument first advanced in an appellate reply brief “protects us from publishing an erroneous opinion because we did not have the benefit of the appellee’s response” (internal quotation marks omitted)
stating this court ordinarily declines to review new arguments made in reply brief
“When an appellant does not challenge a district court’s alternate ground for its ruling, we may affirm the ruling.”
“When an appellant does not challenge a district court’s alternate ground for its ruling, we may affirm the ruling.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, Seymour, and Tymkovich, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.