District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/8/2006
Stapler v. State
Citations
- 939 So. 2d 1092
- 2006 WL 2570848
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that, at a minimum, a rule 3.800(a) motion must \address how and where the record demonstrates an entitlement to relief\
- stating that court generally lacks jurisdiction over probationer upon expiration of probationary period
- stating that court generally lacks jurisdiction over probationer upon expiration of probationary period
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Orfinger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Poore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-09-22· cited 288×
- State v. MancinoSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-06-11· cited 282×
- Baker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-27· cited 76×
- State v. HallSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-08-18· cited 40×
- Carroll v. CochranSupreme Court of Florida· 1962-04-25· cited 20×
- State v. BoydSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-08-27· cited 19×
- Sepulveda v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-02· cited 15×
- Slingbaum v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-29· cited 15×
- Frye v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-18· cited 9×
- Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-09-17· cited 4×
- Jett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-10-05· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.