Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Albany & Susquehanna Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “An erroneous instruction is presumed to be prejudicial and warrants a new trial unless it appears that the complaining party was not prejudiced by such instruction.”
• surplus recommendation of jury may be disregarded as not part of verdict
• \When the material facts are undisputed and only one infer ence may be drawn from them by reasonable minds the questions of negligence and contributory negligence are questions of law for the court.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).