Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1/8/1980
Stancill v. Stancill
Citations
- 408 A.2d 1030
- 286 Md. 530
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a court may not be handcuffed in the exercise of its duty to act in the best interests of a child by any agreement between the parents
- “[T]he Chancellor cannot be handcuffed in the exercise of his duty to act in the best interests of a child by any understanding between parents.”
- obligation to pay non-modifiable wife maintenance not excused by wife’s refusal to honor child visitation arrangements
- “the chancellor cannot be handcuffed in the exercise of his duty to act in the best interest of a child by any understanding between the parties”
- “The chancellor cannot be handcuffed in the exercise of his duty to act in the best interest of a child by any understanding between the parties”
- LTJhe Chancellor cannot be handcuffed in the exercise of his duty to act in the best interests of a child by any understanding between parents.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Smith, Digges, Eldridge, Orth, Cole
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Walter v. GunterCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-01-09· cited 143×
- Solis v. TeaSupreme Court of Delaware· 1983-10-27· cited 102×
- Langston v. RiffeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-06-28· cited 98×
- Tandra S. v. Tyrone W.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-10-07· cited 69×
- Kennedy v. KennedyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-07-08· cited 41×
- Stambaugh v. Child Support Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-06-26· cited 32×
- Conover v. ConoverCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-07· cited 30×
- Giffin v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-09-08· cited 27×
- Thomas v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-11-05· cited 27×
- Hixon v. BuchbergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-05-01· cited 24×
- Kemp v. KempCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-02-22· cited 21×
- Shrivastava v. MatesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-09-08· cited 19×
- Elza v. ElzaCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-06-06· cited 19×
- Sininger v. SiningerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-08-23· cited 17×
- Sampson v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-03-25· cited 10×
- Green v. SollenbergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-04-12· cited 9×
- Guidash v. TomeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-05-06· cited 9×
- Green v. GreenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-10-30· cited 8×
- Lee v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-12-13· cited 8×
- Bland v. LarsenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-07-08· cited 8×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ross v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-04-25· cited 145×
- Rand v. RandCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-06-30· cited 78×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Lotz v. LotzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1958-12-09· cited 51×
- Townsend v. TownsendCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1954-12-13· cited 38×
- Glading v. FurmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-03-27· cited 36×
- Monticello v. MonticelloCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-02-26· cited 34×
- Radford v. MatczukCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1960-11-14· cited 31×
- Barbour v. BarbourMontana Supreme Court· 1958-08-12· cited 30×
- Raible v. RaibleCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-05-27· cited 29×
- Kicherer v. KichererCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-05-04· cited 28×
- Price v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-10-07· cited 28×
- Hester v. HesterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1968-10-09· cited 25×
- Tvardek v. TvardekCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1970-02-16· cited 24×
- Hill v. HillCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1878-06-28· cited 24×
- Mallinger v. MallingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1961-12-14· cited 21×
- In Re Marriage of RoeschCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1978-07-24· cited 21×
- Kane v. KaneSupreme Court of Colorado· 1964-04-13· cited 14×
- COM. Ex Rel. LOTZ v. LotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-07-02· cited 13×
- Lunsford v. WaldripCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1972-02-07· cited 9×
- Seltzer v. SeltzerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1968-10-08· cited 9×
Other cases named Stancill v. Stancill
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.