Skip to main content
· 9/8/1992

Shrivastava v. Mates

Citations

  • 612 A.2d 313
  • 93 Md. App. 320
  • 1992 Md. App. LEXIS 232

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that child support guidelines were equally applicable to litigated orders and child support
  • stating that “[t]he law and policy of this State is that the child’s best interest is of paramount importance and cannot be altered by the parties”
  • recognizing the paramount importance of the child’s best interests and the importance of the guidelines as a matter of public policy, even when the parents had an agreement as to child support
  • discussing that interest in context of child support
  • “The law and policy of this State is that the child’s best interest is of paramount importance and cannot be altered by the parties.”
  • “The law and policy of this State is that the child’s best interest is of paramount importance and cannot be altered by the parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bishop, Fischer, Harrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.