· 9/8/1992
Shrivastava v. Mates
Citations
- 612 A.2d 313
- 93 Md. App. 320
- 1992 Md. App. LEXIS 232
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that child support guidelines were equally applicable to litigated orders and child support
- stating that “[t]he law and policy of this State is that the child’s best interest is of paramount importance and cannot be altered by the parties”
- recognizing the paramount importance of the child’s best interests and the importance of the guidelines as a matter of public policy, even when the parents had an agreement as to child support
- discussing that interest in context of child support
- “The law and policy of this State is that the child’s best interest is of paramount importance and cannot be altered by the parties.”
- “The law and policy of this State is that the child’s best interest is of paramount importance and cannot be altered by the parties.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bishop, Fischer, Harrell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.