Speros v. Fricke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that insurer had “forfeited its opportunity to dispute the underlying facts” giving rise to insured’s liability by breaching duty to defend, but considering insurer’s argument challenging policy coverage (emphasis added) (citing McCarty, 564 P.2d at 1123-24)
• intentional-acts exclusions are unenforceable \up to the minimum liability limits prescribed by ... statute\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).