Holmes Development, LLC v. Cook

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff’s recovery would be “limited to nominal damages” because the defendant “cured the breach” before the plaintiff “incurred actual damages”
• finding that the plaintiff’s recovery would be “limited to nominal damages” because the defendant “cured the breach” before the plaintiff “incurred actual damages”
• finding that “plain language” of the policy meant that title insurance company had fully performed its obligations by defending insured in litigation and successfully establishing title
• \overrulling] the fifth [boundary by acquiescence] requirement of objective uncertainty contained in Holladay v. Cluff\
• plain meaning of “may” is permissive or discretionary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).