Snyder v. Nelson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the insured intentionally rammed the injured party’s car, there was ‘a permissible but not necessary inference to draw from [the insured’s] actions and [therefore] a legitimate question of fact as to whether [the insured] intended the injuries and damage’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).