Skip to main content
D. New Jersey· 4/30/1996

Sperling v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.

Citations

  • 924 F. Supp. 1396
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6446
  • 72 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1401
  • 1996 WL 249858

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • firing an employee because of his high salary does not state a cause of action under the ADEA
  • “[I]t is difficult to rule on the admissibility of pieces of evidence prior to trial. It is often 32 useful to wait and see how the trial unfolds.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harold A. Ackerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.