Earl HOLLEY, Appellee, v. SANYO MANUFACTURING, INC., Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming plaintiff had established prima face case, argument that plaintiff's duties were assumed by younger individual failed to show pretext on the part of defendant
• no statistical basis for age discrimination claim where percentage of employees in protected class was 25.8 percent before layoffs and 26.0 percent after layoffs
• comments about heart problems did not demonstrate age discrimination because those problems “may arise at any age”
• decrease in number of people over 40 in plaintiff's division not evidence of age discrimination where the percentage of protected employees to total employees and the average workforce age increased
• same standards apply to race and age discrimination claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).