Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 6/6/2025

Spencer v. Barajas

Citations

  • 140 F.4th 1061

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding a voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) was not a strike because the dismissal 3 was not “‘on the grounds that’ the case was frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim”
  • finding a voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) was not a strike because the dismissal 25 was not “‘on the grounds that’ the case was frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim”
  • finding a voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) was not a strike because the dismissal 25 was not “‘on the grounds that’ the case was frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim”
  • “Rule 3 | 41(a)(1) voluntary dismissals cannot count as strikes.”
  • “The Supreme Court has emphasized that the three-strikes provision must be interpreted 28 1 other courts, both within and without the federal judicial system, if those proceedings have 2 a direct relation to matters at issue.’” (citation omitted). 3 They are: 4 (1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.