Skip to main content
· 9/19/1990

Southland Corp. v. Mir

Citations

  • 748 F. Supp. 969
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13729
  • 1990 WL 157770

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a breach that went to the “essence of the contract” vitiated the need to comply with the notice and cure provisions of the contract
  • willful scheme to deprive franchisor of its contract rights through money-order scam entitled franchisor to claim for fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mishler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.