· 3/1/1984
The Wisser Company, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Corporation
Citations
- 730 F.2d 54
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 24936
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “it is easier for a franchisee to obtain a preliminary injunction under the PMPA than in the usual case”
- noting that \it is easier for a franchisee to obtain a preliminary injunction under the PMPA than in the usual case\
- less than ninety day notice warranted because there was no indication the franchisee would not have continued to misbrand
- after concluding that franchisee had no right to cure its mis-branding, the court turns to the separate question whether the “forthwith” termination was adequate
- \[I]t is easier for a franchisee to obtain a preliminary injunction under the PMPA than in the usual case....\
- “the proposition that a franchisee always has the right to cure a default is obviously wrong.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Feinberg, Van Graafeiland Kearse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.