Skip to main content
· 3/1/1984

The Wisser Company, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Corporation

Citations

  • 730 F.2d 54
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 24936

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “it is easier for a franchisee to obtain a preliminary injunction under the PMPA than in the usual case”
  • noting that \it is easier for a franchisee to obtain a preliminary injunction under the PMPA than in the usual case\
  • less than ninety day notice warranted because there was no indication the franchisee would not have continued to misbrand
  • after concluding that franchisee had no right to cure its mis-branding, the court turns to the separate question whether the “forthwith” termination was adequate
  • \[I]t is easier for a franchisee to obtain a preliminary injunction under the PMPA than in the usual case....\
  • “the proposition that a franchisee always has the right to cure a default is obviously wrong.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feinberg, Van Graafeiland Kearse

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.