Olin Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Central Industries, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a breach that is “vital to the existence of the contract” excuses performance
• applying Mississippi law and holding “that the termination provision in the Olin-Central agreement did not provide the exclusive means of termination in the event of a material breach which had the effect of substantially defeating the purpose of the contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).