Skip to main content
· 1/28/1998

Sosa v. Airprint Systems, Inc.

Citations

  • 133 F.3d 1417
  • 39 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1181
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 1118
  • 72 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,215
  • 75 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1665
  • 1998 WL 29637

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that good cause standard articulated by Rule 16(b) precludes modification of a scheduling order deadline unless it cannot “be met despite the diligence of the party seeking the extension”
  • “A district court’s decision to enforce its pretrial order will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse [of] discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Barkett, Hull

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.