Scheidecker v. Arvig Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The good cause standard is an exacting one, for it demands a demonstration that the existing schedule cannot be reasonably met despite the diligence of the party seeking the extension.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hibbing Taconite Co.
  D. Minnesota· 2009-12-07· cited 33×
• Target Corp. v. LCH Pavement Consultants, LLC
  D. Minnesota· 2013-08-09· cited 23×
• Pears v. Mobile County
  S.D. Alabama· 2009-08-07· cited 15×
• Amoco Pipeline Co. v. Herman Drainage Systems, Inc.
  W.D. Michigan· 2002-02-06· cited 6×
• Engleson v. Little Falls Area Chamber of Commerce
  D. Minnesota· 2002-06-10· cited 4×
• Fabio v. Credit Bureau of Hutchinson, Inc.
  D. Minnesota· 2002-09-11· cited 3×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-09-14· cited 3,761×
• In Re Milk Products Antitrust Litigation. Rainy Lake One Stop, Inc.
  Eighth Circuit· 1999-11-15· cited 156×
• Unnamed case
  Eighth Circuit· 2000-04-21· cited 104×
• Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Aon Risk Services, Inc.
  D. Minnesota· 1999-06-07· cited 82×
• Sosa v. Airprint Systems, Inc.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1998-01-28· cited 73×
• Miriam Dennis v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.
  Eighth Circuit· 2000-03-28· cited 53×
• Julian v. Equifax Check Services, Inc.
  D. Connecticut· 1998-02-12· cited 16×
• Luigino's Inc. v. Pezrow Companies
  D. Minnesota· 1998-03-03· cited 11×
• Rainy Lake One Stop, Inc. v. Marigold Foods, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2000-03-27· cited 6×

Other cases named Scheidecker v. Arvig Enterprises, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Scheidecker v. Arvig Enterprises, Inc.
  D. Minnesota· 2000-11-09· cited 19×