Scheidecker v. Arvig Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the \regulation is essentially a rewriting of the statute\
• finding that the plaintiff had demonstrated centralized control of labor relations where the two corporate entities had a “shared human resources department”
• the regulation imper-missibly contradicts the clear intent of Congress to restrict the class of employees eligible for the FMLA
• court uses same four Baker factors apply to an \integrated enterprise” or \joint employer” analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).