Atlanta Gas Light Co. v. UGI Utilities, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that courts do not have “an obligation to parse a summary judgment record to search out facts or evidence not brought to the court’s attention.”
• explaining that courts do not have “an obligation to parse a summary judgment record to search out facts or evidence not brought to the court’s attention”
• “[Ajctivities of a parent with respect to its subsidiary consistent with corporate norms should not give rise to liability under CERCLA.”
• “Neither the district court nor this court has an obligation to parse a summary judgment record to search out facts or evidence not brought to the court's attention.”
• “[T]he district court . . . has [no] obligation to parse a summary judgment record to search out facts or evidence not brought to the court’s attention.”
• “Neither the district court nor this court has an obligation to parse a summary judgment record to search out facts or evidence not brought to the court’s attention.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).