Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 11/30/1990

Snell v. Tunnell

Citations

  • 920 F.2d 673
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 20835

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “the district court’s focus” in analyzing the record facts bearing on the conspiracy “was too narrow” and should have taken into consideration the conspirators’ conduct leading up to the allegedly unlawful search
  • providing that an actionable conspiracy under § 1983 must involve an unlawful scheme or plan
  • declining to extend absolute immunity for social workers’ efforts to gain protective custody before filing a petition in court
  • explaining that witnesses “are immune from civil damages based upon their testimony” because they “must be free to testify without fear of a later civil action, so as not to deter witnesses or influence their testimony”
  • applying the principles of Franks to an affidavit filed to secure a court order removing children from a home
  • noting “a plaintiff must establish that, but for the dishonesty, the challenged action would not have occurred” and that probable cause should be assessed by setting aside the alleged false information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

79 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.