Bliss v. Franco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff “enjoyed the full protection of the Fourth Amendment” because her probation had been discharged
• holding that the plaintiff \enjoyed the full protection of the Fourth Amendment\ because her probation had been discharged
• holding that a § 1983 plaintiff must allege that each government official, through the official's own individual actions, has personally violated the Constitution
• holding that a § 1983 plaintiff must show that each state actor violates the Constitution
• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying additional discovery based on “lack of specificity” in the Rule 56(d) affidavit
• holding that the probation officers’ conduct was not the proximate cause of a plaintiffs injuries “if another act intervened and superseded the officer’s liability for subsequent events”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).