Tenth Circuit· 4/25/2006

Bliss v. Franco

Citations

446 F.3d 1036
64 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 781
2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 10342
2006 WL 1075595

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the plaintiff “enjoyed the full protection of the Fourth Amendment” because her probation had been discharged
holding that the plaintiff \enjoyed the full protection of the Fourth Amendment\ because her probation had been discharged
holding that a § 1983 plaintiff must allege that each government official, through the official's own individual actions, has personally violated the Constitution
holding that a § 1983 plaintiff must show that each state actor violates the Constitution
holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying additional discovery based on “lack of specificity” in the Rule 56(d) affidavit
holding that the probation officers’ conduct was not the proximate cause of a plaintiffs injuries “if another act intervened and superseded the officer’s liability for subsequent events”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ebel, Henry, McCONNELL

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

74 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.