Smoot v. Smoot

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court had the statutory authority to preclude visitation altogether upon a showing that visitation would significantly impair child’s emotional development

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Carmichael v. Siegel
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-08-31· cited 112×
• Mitchell v. Stevenson
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1997-02-28· cited 84×
• Scott v. Scott
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1996-06-25· cited 47×
• Meade v. Levett
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1996-08-15· cited 35×
• Hunt v. Hunt
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-12-29· cited 8×
• Farmer v. Farmer
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-09-19· cited 5×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stewart v. Stewart
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1988-04-20· cited 53×
• Marriage of Eyler v. Eyler
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1986-05-22· cited 52×
• Haag v. Haag
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1959-12-22· cited 51×
• Elbert v. Elbert
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1991-09-30· cited 31×
• Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Hutchens
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1973-07-03· cited 13×
• Sullivan v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1991-12-17· cited 9×