Hunt v. Hunt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence of only nominal charges for telephone calls does not amount to waste of marital assets

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re the Marriage of Coyle
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1996-10-30· cited 44×
• In re Marriage of Bartley
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1999-06-10· cited 41×
• Marriage of Webb v. Schleutker
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2008-08-15· cited 36×
• Grathwohl v. Garrity
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-07-30· cited 29×
• Marriage of Jendreas v. Jendreas
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1996-04-16· cited 27×
• MacHer v. MacHer
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-04-17· cited 14×
• Marriage of Macher v. Macher
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-04-17· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Marriage of Snemis
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1991-07-25· cited 62×
• Marriage of Fiste v. Fiste
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-02-02· cited 36×
• Marriage of R.E.G. v. L.M.G.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1991-05-14· cited 32×
• Smoot v. Smoot
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1992-12-02· cited 7×