Smithers v. C & G Custom Module Hauling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that while the argument to exclude the life-care plan may have merit, “on balance [it] go[es] to the weight, not the admissibility of the proposed evidence”
• granting motion to exclude expert testimony where it was so unreliable as to render the testimony “unlikely to assist the fact[-]finder in any meaningful way”
• finding expert misapplied momentum analysis to calculate vehicle’s pre-impact speed and disallowing testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).