Skip to main content
· 8/15/2007

Papke v. Harbert

Citations

  • 2007 SD 87
  • 738 N.W.2d 510
  • 2007 S.D. LEXIS 154
  • 2007 WL 2353132

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • error admitted, heavy reliance on and reference to the error in judgment instruction during closing argument, and claim that the instruction is vital to the defense theory
  • “when establishing the reasonable value of medical services, defendants in South Dakota are currently prohibited from introducing evidence that a plaintiff’s award should be reduced because of a benefit received wholly independent of the defendants”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Konenkamp, Gilbertson, Sabers, Zinter, Meierhenry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.