W.D. North Carolina· 2/28/2012
Smith v. Walker
Citations
- 845 F. Supp. 2d 673
- 2012 WL 628195
- 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25038
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Delay in medical care, without showing substantial harm, does not violate the [Constitution].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Conrad
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 28,443×
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court· 1976-11-30· cited 28,035×
- Garcia Jay Wright v. George Collins, Warden, Maryland Penitentiary Dr. Berry Officer Larry DonnellFourth Circuit· 1985-01-07· cited 4,454×
- Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court· 2009-06-29· cited 1,988×
- Miltier v. BeornFourth Circuit· 1990-02-20· cited 712×
- Grayson v. PeedFourth Circuit· 1999-11-05· cited 592×
- Raymundo R. Mendoza v. James A. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Criminal JusticeFifth Circuit· 1993-04-28· cited 495×
- Sylvia Development Corporation v. Calvert CountyFourth Circuit· 1995-03-03· cited 431×
- Richard S. Johnson v. Moises Quinones, M.D. Joseph Morris, O.D.Fourth Circuit· 1998-05-12· cited 373×
- Stokes v. HurdleD. Maryland· 1975-03-26· cited 71×
- Wynn v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MUNDOM.D. North Carolina· 2005-02-07· cited 20×
- Wynn v. MundoFourth Circuit· 2005-09-01· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.