Wynn v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MUNDO

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a 36-hour or two-day delay between report of flu-like symptoms and doctor’s appointment was not a sufficiently serious delay to establish an Eighth Amendment violation
• delay in receipt of medical care only constitutes deliberate indifference where plaintiff can show that the delay caused substantial harm
• “[T]his court is persuaded that delay in the receipt of medical care only constitutes deliberate indifference where the plaintiff can show that the delay caused substantial harm.”
• “[T]his court is persuaded that delay in the receipt of medical care only constitutes deliberate indifference where the plaintiff can show that the delay caused substantial harm.”
• “A medical treatment claim cannot be brought against non-medical personnel, however, unless they were personally involved with a denial of treatment or deliberately interfered with prison doctors’ treatment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).